Jump to content

AR 3536


Solar_Marcel
Go to solution Solved by Calder,

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Drax Spacex said:

There may be several deltas, perhaps small south and large north.  The first post in this thread shows well the general north/south orientation of flare connections.  There are also sigmoid structures, further characterizing the region's complexity:

https://ibb.co/dJ5zgVk
https://ibb.co/pXrJw8p

Screenshot2024-01-01200422.jpg.d3669c86512e96857641a634439ffd70.jpg

Found this picture which shows the loops pretty well i think. Also above our region at a higher latitude there is some other bright loops, could this be another region? 
AR 3536 sure looks very interesting, and it just keeps going with some M flares already today. I wish for an earth directed X flare. Last time i said that we got X5.01. Maybe the sun will grant my wishes again, lol

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Solar_Marcel said:

Screenshot2024-01-01200422.jpg.d3669c86512e96857641a634439ffd70.jpg

Found this picture which shows the loops pretty well i think. Also above our region at a higher latitude there is some other bright loops, could this be another region? 
AR 3536 sure looks very interesting, and it just keeps going with some M flares already today. I wish for an earth directed X flare. Last time i said that we got X5.01. Maybe the sun will grant my wishes again, lol

Screenshot2024-01-01203011.jpg.2109bdc5a972b8b7debe98299c75ddf5.jpg

Quickly made this picture, which i think shows the shier magnetic complexity of this turning in region. I hope we´ll get more fireworks from this and coming in regions. Wound be very nice to see this!

Edit: Also 10,7cm Solar Radio Flux rised by 6 today. if it keeps rising we will be in on maybe more of these kind of regions to welcome us with strong C, M or X flares, haha.

image.png.d83b56d3f787b59c8782c6041a937cd1.png

Faside map also looks promising with one region just behind the limb there which also could be a banger region, but lets not get the hopes high because well, often then came disappointments :(

Edited by Solar_Marcel
Edited stuff + infos were added
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jesterface23 said:

The CME likely would have passed 1AU at this point. It is now to see how much of a glancing blow we will get.

1AU is where Dscovr etc are?

Sorry I’m a bit dense today. Do you mean the main CME would’ve hit now and depending on how much longer until our impact will show how much of a glancing blow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MinYoongi said:

1AU is where Dscovr etc are?

Sorry I’m a bit dense today. Do you mean the main CME would’ve hit now and depending on how much longer until our impact will show how much of a glancing blow?

The tip of the CME should have reached 1AU maybe 70-80 degrees to our east by now. I'm sticking with an L1 arrival somewhere between the late afternoon on the 2nd to early on the 3rd UTC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MinYoongi said:

While I don’t understand NOAAs model they put out a post on Twitter with G1 warning

NOAA are ALWAYS extremely pessimistic in terms of KP index and time of arrival 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tniickck said:

NOAA are ALWAYS extremely pessimistic in terms of KP index and time of arrival 

They are actually the only ones predicting such an early arrival if you compare with net space weather office, nasa, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, tniickck said:

i will stay awake until the morning. we have clear sky first time since the beginning of December

I'll also stay awake tonight, but chances are it will hit during daytime here if NASA is correct or before sunrise if NOAA is correct (NOAA is never correct so I don't expect much lol)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Fishaxolotl said:

Seems like the region is growing a lot and becoming more complex, what with it now being classified as beta gamma delta so we may get some fireworks soon

it is actually decaying. it was classified as b-g-d because it rotated further so we can correctly identify it's complexity

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tniickck said:

it is actually decaying. it was classified as b-g-d because it rotated further so we can correctly identify it's complexity

I also think the same but noaa did still give it 20% for an X but maybe because of its history? I compared sdo imagery and it does look to be less complex to me. I’d like to hear your guys opinions ☺️

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you also agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.