Philalethes Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) 2 minutes ago, hamateur 1953 said: I don’t know who or what donki is but that’s a fast cme! Up there with Aug 4 1972 More like the 2012 one, perhaps; similar position too, heh. Not quite as far beyond the limb though. Edited February 9 by Philalethes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 1 minute ago, Philalethes said: More like the 2012 one, perhaps; similar position too, heh. Not quite as far beyond the limb though. how often do you think do such cmes happen? maybe interesting read for you guys. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 We will see more no doubt. Hopefully we are in the target zone next shot @MinYoongi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 1 minute ago, hamateur 1953 said: We will see more no doubt. Hopefully we are in the target zone next shot @MinYoongi do you think the region will return? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 7 minutes ago, MinYoongi said: how often do you think do such cmes happen? We've possibly already had a few somewhat similar this cycle. But with a smaller CME comes a smaller chance of getting hit by one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Majors Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Is this bad or no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Just now, Nathan Majors said: Is this bad or no Bad. It isn't hitting us and we missed a good chance to see the aurora. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Warfel Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Just now, Jesterface23 said: Bad. It isn't hitting us and we missed a good chance to see the aurora. Well said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Majors Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 I ment bad for tech Sorry I wasn’t clear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Warfel Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 No, and as I’ve said before, please stop asking if anything is bad for Earth/tech, nothing we will see is. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Majors Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 But next time hopefully we are in the target zone Sorry about that everyone 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 9 minutes ago, Jesterface23 said: We've possibly already had a few somewhat similar this cycle. But with a smaller CME comes a smaller chance of getting hit by one. I guess only 13 Mar 2023 one will be faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 22 minutes ago, Philalethes said: More like the 2012 one, perhaps; similar position too, heh. Not quite as far beyond the limb though. It’s fairly safe to say that it reached escape velocity. Haha 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willow Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 26 minutes ago, MinYoongi said: how often do you think do such cmes happen? maybe interesting read for you guys. hoping to see similar beauty from 3576 next!😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 That’s the spirit!! 1 minute ago, willow said: hoping to see similar beauty from 3576 next!😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) 3575 seemed to be shrinking as it approached the limb, so I am a bit surprised it was able to produce such a big eruption. Edited February 9 by Aten 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 2 minutes ago, willow said: hoping to see similar beauty from 3576 next!😁 no way😃 Russian media are already full of shitty news about strong geomagnetic storms from that flare😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay-B Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 when watching the video above it looks like it shot a bullet of plasma out of the bottom left of the flare! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Just now, Aten said: 3575 seemed to be shrinking as is approached the limb, so I am a bit surprised it was able to produce such a big eruption. sadly we cant see development when it rotates off sadly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drax Spacex Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 This was a Sun rattler! Have a look at the southern filament that released after writhing and wiggling from the turbulent shockwaves that emanated from this X3.3 flare. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 3 minutes ago, MinYoongi said: sadly we cant see development when it rotates off sadly not X10, but likely X6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Just now, tniickck said: not X10, but likely X6 I agree, X10 seems like a reach, but what do I know 😜 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philalethes Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 7 minutes ago, tniickck said: not X10, but likely X6 6 minutes ago, mozy said: I agree, X10 seems like a reach, but what do I know 😜 I was trying earlier to find the email of the lead author of the study that estimated X-flare strength from STEREO-A EUVI imagery, and I came across some details where the Halo CME Twitter/X account was listed as their personal website, so I guess that makes me take such a claim more seriously, heh; but in this case it wasn't even fully visible from SA it seems like, and I doubt their statement is based on any such analysis anyway. X10 definitely sounds too high to me as well, but then again I would guess they have a fair bit of experience looking at things based on their published work as a Solar physicist (not just that paper, but a lot of others too). 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 That was an impressive shock. Whoever halo cme is. Thnx fer sharing that! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 18 minutes ago, tniickck said: not X10, but likely X6 I would say X5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.7abe2161b0f23cd159d2d4a196ed224a.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now