tniickck Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 it has reversed polarities and is located on S35-40, so we should keep an eye on it 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Oh does it? What does that change exactly? (I think more activity?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 2 Author Share Posted February 2 2 hours ago, MinYoongi said: Oh does it? What does that change exactly? (I think more activity?) groups with reversed polarities have 2 times bigger chance to develop complex magnetic configuration than normal ones. also as far as i know the group that are close to the poles have also bigger chances, but I may be wrong 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 hour ago, tniickck said: groups with reversed polarities have 2 times bigger chance to develop complex magnetic configuration than normal ones. also as far as i know the group that are close to the poles have also bigger chances, but I may be wrong And as of now it has developed a lot since you made this post. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian Kobyłecki Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Out of curiosity, how quickly can such a spot grow because it's the first time I've seen one since I started getting interested in space weather.It looks beautiful 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 36 minutes ago, Adrian Kobyłecki said: Out of curiosity, how quickly can such a spot grow because it's the first time I've seen one since I started getting interested in space weather.It looks beautiful @arjemma posted a really cool one day time lapse on this forum a bit ago of an amazing group. Perhaps she is willing to repost it if she is around. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parabolic Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 It's growth in the last 24 hours is really good. I'm also curious how it's going to behave being in such close proximity to that coronal hole! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 3 Author Share Posted February 3 3 hours ago, Adrian Kobyłecki said: Out of curiosity, how quickly can such a spot grow because it's the first time I've seen one since I started getting interested in space weather.It looks beautiful you should check out AR 2673 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Also 9393. And of course 10486 for the truly spectacular spots of archival history, Haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maurizio Marsigli Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 https://community.spaceweatherlive.com/topic/2220-growth-of-cycle-25/?do=findComment&comment=37945 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philalethes Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 19 minutes ago, Maurizio Marsigli said: https://community.spaceweatherlive.com/topic/2220-growth-of-cycle-25/?do=findComment&comment=37945 It's an interesting thought, but now it looks even less likely that it's one of the first SC26 spots, since it's demonstrating the growth and complexity of a reverse polarity spot. We probably won't see the SC26 bands start to appear until sometime next year, maybe later this year at the earliest. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 3 Author Share Posted February 3 bgd already, I'm waiting for it to start flaring 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 hour ago, tniickck said: bgd already, I'm waiting for it to start flaring Thank you for the update Have not watched it until now. im not sure if its only gamma or already delta due to the lack of flaring. what do you say @Philalethes @tniickck? i think it has not alot of shear as of now because only the penumbras are touching afaik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 3 Author Share Posted February 3 42 minutes ago, MinYoongi said: Thank you for the update Have not watched it until now. im not sure if its only gamma or already delta due to the lack of flaring. what do you say @Philalethes @tniickck? i think it has not alot of shear as of now because only the penumbras are touching afaik delta configuration doesnt mean it should always flare. actually, it is good now: usually complex groups first develop, then begin flaring with very strong and eruptive flares or lots of impulsive ones. looking at size of deltas the first option is more possible, so we should just wait and see if it starts making flares or just dissolve 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chronical Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 If it produces a CME what effects would the coronal hole right next to it have on the CME? Right now with its position would the coronal hole push it away? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 3 Author Share Posted February 3 1 hour ago, chronical said: If it produces a CME what effects would the coronal hole right next to it have on the CME? Right now with its position would the coronal hole push it away? that’s the main thing i would want to see from this region. i have never seen active sunspot groups this close to CH, so it would be nice to see how the solar wind will affect the CME 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parabolic Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 hour ago, chronical said: If it produces a CME what effects would the coronal hole right next to it have on the CME? Right now with its position would the coronal hole push it away? Depends on quite a few factors. The most impactful is normally the solar wind itself, it can either slow down a CME or clear a path allowing it to travel less inhibited. I'm not 100% confident about their magnetic field interactions but I do know that they can't pass thru or absorb each other. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arjemma Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 16 hours ago, hamateur 1953 said: @arjemma posted a really cool one day time lapse on this forum a bit ago of an amazing group. Perhaps she is willing to repost it if she is around. Here it is (I think) 😎 This was a really nice region. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 I wish this spot was 3 times bigger 😕 It’s complex but it needs to grow in size. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) 1 hour ago, arjemma said: Here it is (I think) 😎 This was a really nice region. Yes, that is the example I was remembering. Tnx @arjemma! Guess we are off topic again here. For clarification, this is a shot of a particularly fast-growing region a few revolutions back this SC and i’ m outta likes again. Haha. Edited February 3 by hamateur 1953 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay-B Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Why is this website way off center for the picture of this sunspot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Just now, Jay-B said: Why is this website way off center for the picture of this sunspot? what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar_Marcel Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 55 minutes ago, MinYoongi said: what? When you go to the sunspot groups you dont actually see the region in the picture thats been shown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vancanneyt Sander Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 10 minuten geleden, Solar_Marcel zei: When you go to the sunspot groups you dont actually see the region in the picture thats been shown Well… it came to our attention something was off after a report of a user indicating that the sunspot info of the region wasn’t up to date. After investigating our queries and the database we identified the root cause (it doesn’t happen with all regions but only with some). A fix has been implemented to make sure it can’t happen again. Now the correct information is loaded from the database, so the imagery is now also corrected as it is based from that. (Due to caching it could take up to 1 hour before new images are seen but should be already visible now as seen in the screenshot) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parabolic Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 3575 seems to have made CH 96 slowly disappear. I wonder what influence 3575 had in the convective zone/chromosphere. I've observed this over the past 12 hours and I couldn't find any other similar instances. I don't have the means to post side by side images at this time, I will likely try later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.7abe2161b0f23cd159d2d4a196ed224a.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now