Jump to content

Unspecified geomagnetic activity


Isatsuki San
Message added by Sam Warfel,

Use this thread to discuss any minor questions or unspecified geomagnetic activity. 

For discussion of expected inbound CMEs, or noticeable geomagnetic storms, please create new threads (“X2 CME prediction”, “G3 storming”)

Thank you!

Recommended Posts

For now the conditions are 404 km/second in the solar wind and 14.38 bt and the bz 4.99 south, with kp4 conditions for now, it could be a Sir, but the curious thing is that the epam did not detect any arrival of cme, so it could be a cme that hit us indirectly or one weak enough not to be detected by the epam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Isatsuki San said:

For now the conditions are 404 km/second in the solar wind and 14.38 bt and the bz 4.99 south, with kp4 conditions for now, it could be a Sir, but the curious thing is that the epam did not detect any arrival of cme, so it could be a cme that hit us indirectly or one weak enough not to be detected by the epam

It actually was detected by EPAM! Protons do not always need to be rising before a CME impact, especially in the case where they have already been so elevated. The signature is that they started dropping off rapidly, going closer to their nominal levels. This is the indication that a shock front passed. I’m sure if we had data at the time, we would have seen a very small spike in EPAM before the falloff. Alas, ACE is struggling lately 😅
 

EPAM plot (24 Hours):
https://ibb.co/pzhQwt0

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
Hace 14 minutos, Landon Moeller dijo:

¡En realidad fue detectado por EPAM ! No siempre es necesario que los protones estén aumentando antes de un impacto de CME , especialmente en el caso en que ya han estado tan elevados. La señal es que comenzó a caer rápidamente, acercándose a sus niveles nominales. Esta es la indicación de que pasó un frente de choque. Estoy seguro de que si tuviéramos datos en ese momento, habríamos visto un aumento muy pequeño en EPAM antes de la caída. Por desgracia, ACE está teniendo problemas últimamente😅
 

Parcela EPAM (24 Horas):
https://ibb.co/pzhQwt0

Oh wow, I didn't notice it, I always look at the epam to see if a cme is coming, but did epam fall? I didn't know that epam would fall

Edited by Isatsuki San
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite a nice impact. I won't be surprised if we reach the G2 threshold. The speed is now around 480 km/s which is about 160 km/s higher than before impact and Bz still nice cooperating.

Edited by AndrewB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AndrewB said:

Quite a nice impact. I won't be surprised if we reach the G2 threshold. The speed is now around 480 km/s which is about 160 km/s higher than before impact and Bz still nice cooperating.

Would be nice if this would continue for at least 2 more hours, then I could maybe see something... But will probably jump north just when it gets dark 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, mozy said:

bz will magically turn north now that clouds have cleared & it's finally getting dark here 😎

Are you clear? :) 

12 minutes ago, Landon Moeller said:

Really hoping we can get a core to rebound things.

 

4 minutes ago, Jesterface23 said:

Welp, G3

How did we reach G3 from this ?

It’s pretty northward I think, how can it reach g3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jesterface23 said:

It's being in the position of the CME+CIR to CH HSS transition. High velocities, density is still elevated, and that negative Bz as well

So that all is causing the G3 conditions rather than just the neg. Bz? I’m a bit rusty :)  has been a while..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MinYoongi said:

So that all is causing the G3 conditions rather than just the neg. Bz? I’m a bit rusty :)  has been a while..

Pretty much think of this transition period as the sheath of a CME in a way. Elevated velocities and density. Then hope the Bz does what it needs to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jesterface23 said:

Pretty much think of this transition period as the sheath of a CME in a way. Elevated velocities and density. Then hope the Bz does what it needs to

But im confused why after 12h it goes to G3. Have you seen the tweet i attached? Is that a possibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jesterface23 said:

Podrían ser las velocidades, ya que era el único parámetro que está aumentando.

ok the first thing I will say is that I am surprised, a cme that you have not seen or that arrived late is producing a geogmanetic storm g3
And the second thing, do you think it will rise more than the g3 or will it just stay there or will it go down?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Isatsuki San said:

ok the first thing I will say is that I am surprised, a cme that you have not seen or that arrived late is producing a geogmanetic storm g3
And the second thing, do you think it will rise more than the g3 or will it just stay there or will it go down?

You wouldn't expect a CME that takes 4 days to arrive to get a good geomagnetic storm out of it. It is pretty much by chance that it interacted with a CH and negative Bz for this to happen.

To compare, SA's IMF shock was ~7.5nT. 5 hours later the CHs interactions helped reach an IMF strength of almost 20nT.

And if there is a flux rope, there is a chance activity could continue. Or when the HSS fully kicks in the activity could come to a quick stop. Not really sure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Isatsuki San said:

ok the first thing I will say is that I am surprised, a cme that you have not seen or that arrived late is producing a geogmanetic storm g3

Reminds me a bit of the surprise G4 we got under similar circumstances, also around April, which if I remember correctly was also a combination of a SIR and a CME that wasn't very noteworthy (maybe someone recalls the exact circumstances better). Probably also of help that we're still relatively close to the equinox (including the R-M effect, which for the March equinox is expected to occur for IMF toward Sol, exactly what you get from negative CHs).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you also agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.