Jump to content

AR2993/2994: X flare!


Recommended Posts

Well, this caught my eye this morning, spaceweather.com once again is talking about another farside region. As I was reading it, they said this: 

Quote

The dark region in today's helioseismic map could be old sunspot AR2975, which rotated onto the farside of the sun about a week ago. In late March it unleashed a fusillade of strong Earth-directed explosions including a Cannibal CME and an X-class solar flare. The active region appears to be still going strong.

Here is it:

 helioseismic_strip2.jpg

and here:

http://jsoc.stanford.edu/data/farside/

So if this is the case, we may have another shot of some good activity. Anyways let's hope for something good and that spaceweather.com isn't over exaggerating. Anyways, fingers crossed! 

 

Edited by Orneno
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MinYoongi said:

I really start to dread spaceweather.com.
i dont read the page anymore, too much sensationalism. Disgusting.

They just constantly over exaggerate and it gets annoying after awhile. The reason I made this post, is  because  if this is AR2975, then we can see how it’s doing on the Far side. 

 

7 hours ago, MinYoongi said:

Back to topic, yeah. could be the AR. still a long way back to earth facing disk i guess

Hopefully it is that AR. it would be nice to have another week of crazy haha. At least to me. 

Edited by Solarflaretracker200
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot can happen in a 14 day transit on the farside. Not many regions survive a solar rotation, only the biggest and strong regions can do that. Plus farside imagery isn’t exact and always has to be taken with a big grain of salt. Let’s wait when it’s about to rotate to the visible side and see if it is still active. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Vancanneyt Sander said:

A lot can happen in a 14 day transit on the farside. Not many regions survive a solar rotation, only the biggest and strong regions can do that. Plus farside imagery isn’t exact and always has to be taken with a big grain of salt. Let’s wait when it’s about to rotate to the visible side and see if it is still active. 

More like a cube of salt. AR2975 was complex and strong, but it wasn’t really all that big, not by Solar Maximum standards. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Orneno said:

More like a cube of salt. AR2975 was complex and strong, but it wasn’t really all that big, not by Solar Maximum standards. 

Also we dont really see CME's from the Farside rn. Doesnt speaks for big activity, it was in gradual decay before/while rotating off.

Still 10 Days to go until its on the limb again, lets hope for the best !

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2022 at 9:27 AM, MinYoongi said:

I really start to dread spaceweather.com.
i dont read the page anymore, too much sensationalism. Disgusting.

It's all about the clicks.  Fortunately for them, the sun offers limitless opportunities for sensationalism that attracts the doomsday and flat earth crowd.

What bothers me about it is the "crying wolf effect".  What happens when the sun does something really significant that will have real effects on the ground?  Fortunately, the people who need to implement precautions don't get their info from spaceweather.com.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is this far side "imagery" is a phase correlation map using integrated doppler shift data from the SDO HMI sensor.  If you subscribe to helioseismology, then you also subscribe to the notion that the sun is transparent, or at least translucent, such that you can "see through" the front of the sun to the back of the sun, even if coarsely.

I haven't seen any scoring algorithms (or results) to maintain a tally of just how accurate this technique is in predicting what's coming around the East limb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was the farside CME visible today from 2975? When does it return back onto the disc?

Noaa said on the 15th but json farside map says 17th so im confused.

 

Solar activity is expected to be very low 13-14 Apr and low 15 Apr with
a chance for C-class flares due to the anticipated return of old Region
2975.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MinYoongi said:

Was the farside CME visible today from 2975? When does it return back onto the disc?

Noaa said on the 15th but json farside map says 17th so im confused.

 

Solar activity is expected to be very low 13-14 Apr and low 15 Apr with
a chance for C-class flares due to the anticipated return of old Region
2975.

5.8 days according to this: http://jsoc.stanford.edu/data/farside/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MinYoongi said:

Was the farside CME visible today from 2975? When does it return back onto the disc?

Noaa said on the 15th but json farside map says 17th so im confused.

 

Solar activity is expected to be very low 13-14 Apr and low 15 Apr with
a chance for C-class flares due to the anticipated return of old Region
2975.

Because it is such a very large area it is likely that the leading edge will be on the limb by the 15th, followed by the central region on the 17th. If you look in the Archive of sunspot regions on this website you can see that the leading edge was close to the west limb on 1st April and the trailing edge was still just visible on the 4th April. It left as a Beta-Gamma but we cannot be sure what complexity it will have when it returns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 3gMike said:

Because it is such a very large area it is likely that the leading edge will be on the limb by the 15th, followed by the central region on the 17th. If you look in the Archive of sunspot regions on this website you can see that the leading edge was close to the west limb on 1st April and the trailing edge was still just visible on the 4th April. It left as a Beta-Gamma but we cannot be sure what complexity it will have when it returns

Ty :) makes sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking on Stereo the region is not particularly bright, so probably not very active. I think that the brighter patch on the trailing edge could possibly even be the old AR2976.

ahead_euvi_195_latest13-04-22.jpg.04dacf395b4c2a6ecaf5b91888e63cee.jpg

Edited by 3gMike
Corrected Region Number !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Solarflaretracker200 said:

Looking good, but i am still going to wait. 

AR_Map.png

3347 for strength- what does that even mean?

The unit for Strength is micro-hemisphere radians, so I presume it corresponds to the area of the elongated red amoeba.

Edited by Drax Spacex
spelling
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Patrick P.A. Geryl said:

Mike,

look at the document I send. AR 2975 was still on this side April 2. So at the earliest visible on stereo April 15.

When will it be Earth Facing again? Or Geoeffective?

12 hours ago, 3gMike said:

Looking on Stereo the region is not particularly bright, so probably not very active. I think that the brighter patch on the trailing edge could possibly even be the old AR2976.

ahead_euvi_195_latest13-04-22.jpg.04dacf395b4c2a6ecaf5b91888e63cee.jpg

Yeah but it gained 1k in Strength and unleashed a CME today. I dont know much about CME's but did it look strong? It was big but i dont know if it was strong. I saw Nasa modelled it but again, i dont know what strong is.

34 minutes ago, Drax Spacex said:

The unit for Strength is micro-hemisphere radians, so I presume it corresponds to the area of the elongated red amoeba.

Can you please explain that for dumb people? (me) 

Also: How Reliable are those Maps? Does someone here have some info and/or experience with them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you also agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.