tniickck Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 (edited) this region produced 3 m-flares (including M6.83) on the day of its appearance on visible part of the sun,so it is really worth observation. in addition, it raised the level of background flux Edited July 11, 2023 by Sam Warfel 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sam Warfel Posted July 11, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted July 11, 2023 This is certainly an exciting looking region. It hasn't officially been numbered yet I think, but we can change it if gets a different number. Stay active, mr sunspot! 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 This sunspot is making the solar flux very high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sapphire828 Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 First post on here, been lurking since the big sunspot in May. Bought some solar glasses and have been interested in all the solar activity lately. Came here to ask if anyone has checked the Mars mastcam pictures for a sneak peak of this incoming AR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3gMike Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 2 hours ago, tniickck said: this region produced 3 m-flares (including M6.83) on the day of its appearance on visible part of the sun,so it is really worth observation. in addition, it raised the level of background flux Looking at magnetic field data from WSO, captured late June, it looks like this is a moderately strong region. What I find interesting is that the centres of the fields are quite widely separated. Of course it is possible that there has been some development since this image was captured. It certainly is doing well so far, and SWPC have given it a good rating. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted July 11, 2023 Author Share Posted July 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Sapphire828 said: New flare, around M5 by far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ester89 Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 Yeah, here we go with another big one 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted July 11, 2023 Author Share Posted July 11, 2023 M5.8, M6.7 and a couple of M1s in 1 day is actually very spectacular from 1 region i think the next few days gonna be fun 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philalethes Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, Sam Warfel said: Stay active, mr sunspot! Edited July 11, 2023 by Philalethes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 All that's missing are the CMEs 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted July 11, 2023 Author Share Posted July 11, 2023 its actually already more flare-effective than the AR 3354, but we didnt even see it full yet 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ester89 Posted July 11, 2023 Share Posted July 11, 2023 For now I'm satisfied with making the notifications on my mobile pop up. Too long no action 😆 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 (edited) That is one helluva explosion shock wave over 4000 km/sec if the numbers are correct! 🤣 4583km/sec as noted on this site! N. Edited July 12, 2023 by Newbie I was taken seriously really lol!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xavier Stanton Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 I don't think the CME is fast enough for a Type II emission of that velocity. Can anyone with more knowledge provide insight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calder Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Newbie said: That is one helluva explosion shock wave over 4000 km/sec if the numbers are correct! 4583km/sec as noted on this site! N. I don’t think the numbers are correct. Next one showing an estimated velocity of: “2023 Jul 12 003 km/sec” with the date at the top showing Jan 1, 1970 lol. Edited July 12, 2023 by Calder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 3 minutes ago, Calder said: I don’t think the numbers are correct. Another one showing 003 km/sec now lol. 1970 😅 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calder Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 1 minute ago, mozy said: 1970 😅 Yeah, I noticed that right after and edited my post 😂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 An alert was canceled, so that probably wasn't taken into account and the result comes to getting a wrong value and an epoch time of 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 So the 4K is wrong too? 48 minutes ago, Newbie said: That is one helluva explosion shock wave over 4000 km/sec if the numbers are correct! 🤣 4583km/sec as noted on this site! N. What o.O which one? That can’t be right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 4583km/s was wrong, the next alert canceled it, 2536km/s is the correction 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 51 minutes ago, MinYoongi said: So the 4K is wrong too? What o.O which one? That can’t be right? Nup too good to be true Min too good to be true 🤪🤪🤪 N. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted July 12, 2023 Author Share Posted July 12, 2023 (edited) i just woke up and saw how many flares there were while i was sleeping Edited July 12, 2023 by tniickck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vancanneyt Sander Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 9 uren geleden, mozy zei: 1970 😅 can happen when SWPC does things not in an expected way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted July 12, 2023 Author Share Posted July 12, 2023 9 hours ago, mozy said: 1970 😅 xdd strange that yesterday's M5 and M6 still were not reclassified as ones from 3372 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChefyStephie Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 25 minutes ago, tniickck said: xdd strange that yesterday's M5 and M6 still were not reclassified as ones from 3372 As I understand it, the “powers that be” were still analyzing the data for several hours after the first few flares. It’s taking longing than usual for that to trickle down. This region was *just* peaking over the limb, with other regions more visible Earth side that were active, so that’s likely the source of the hiccup. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.7abe2161b0f23cd159d2d4a196ed224a.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now