Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 why do you think we are getting more of the CME just because the protons are rising? NASA DONKI says it is going to be a glancing blow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxime Fiset Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 What are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 the EPAM rising before the next CME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxime Fiset Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 Maybe just a little proton event from one of the geoeffective regions. What are you afraid of, now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 because the article said we might get more of the CME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxime Fiset Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 What article? When you quote something, make sure to actually quote something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 it said The rising trend of the low energy protons as shown on EPAM suggests that there might be more ejecta on the Sun-Earth line then we first expected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxime Fiset Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 Yes. You have your answer now. It was right in the article you tried to quote. Quote link to article next time. And read that : http://www.wikihow.com/Cite-a-Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 how big of a storm are we going to get then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxime Fiset Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 Well, judging by the fact that NOAA expects G1, I'd say... G1. Maybe G2, if they underestimated the ejecta mass. Remember the scale I gave you and told you NOT to forget? G1 : Pff, who cares?G2 : Possible auroras!G3 : Oooh, shiny, auroras!G4 : Well, that's gonna be a show!G5 : Interesting, I could use a free day to watch events unfold... and fill up my gas tank.G5+ : Well, perharps I could also fill my bathtub with water... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel de Bont Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 No worries danderson500, the world wont end as you know it. But it is an interesting case we got here. Based on LASCO one could very well say this CME is unlikely to give us a glancing blow but the low energy protons as measured by ACE EPAM are really showing a nice and steady rise. Should be interesting to see what kind of impact we are getting, if any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 but the EPAM rising could be a false alarm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel de Bont Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 but the EPAM rising could be a false alarm Let's hope it's not a false alarm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 No worries danderson500, the world wont end as you know it. But it is an interesting case we got here. Based on LASCO one could very well say this CME is unlikely to give us a glancing blow but the low energy protons as measured by ACE EPAM are really showing a nice and steady rise. Should be interesting to see what kind of impact we are getting, if any.looking at CACTUS i see only 534 in median velocity so maybe it wont be a major impact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel de Bont Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 looking at CACTUS i see only 534 in median velocity so maybe it wont be a major impact Exactly! That's the spirit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danderson500 Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 but why did we get a G4 in march? now i know why a fliment came in at just the right time as a C9 flare and CME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel de Bont Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 but why did we get a G4 in march? now i know why a fliment came in at just the right time as a C9 flare and CME That is a really easy question. This image should tell it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.