Miles Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Figured a topic should be started for region 3583 since it’s emergence and rapid growth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 29 minutes ago, Miles said: Figured a topic should be started for region 3583 since it’s emergence and rapid growth. Good call, both low latitude regions 3582 and 3583 already showing C level activity on our board. Further development a good possibility. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 It's morphing and moving around a lot, A good source of flares for this week. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar_Marcel Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, Miles said: Figured a topic should be started for region 3583 since it’s emergence and rapid growth. there is actually a topic about AR 3583/AR 3582 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinYoongi Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 46 minutes ago, Solar_Marcel said: there is actually a topic about AR 3583/AR 3582 huh where? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) What would be really fun would be for two new anti-hale regions to appear between the two current ARs. Another “ Train wreck “ to keep SWPC scratching their heads. 😃 I am just asking to be hated with that remark. Sorry SWPC. My humble apologies. Mike. Edited February 11 by hamateur 1953 Apology 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar_Marcel Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 22 minutes ago, MinYoongi said: huh where? Here: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tniickck Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 do i see a ring structure?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 hours ago, Solar_Marcel said: there is actually a topic about AR 3583/AR 3582 There is nothing connecting the regions, so I don't quite see why they would be under the same topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar_Marcel Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 3 hours ago, tniickck said: do i see a ring structure?? yes 1 hour ago, Jesterface23 said: There is nothing connecting the regions, so I don't quite see why they would be under the same topic because they are similar i thought make a thread for both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Warfel Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 4 hours ago, Solar_Marcel said: because they are similar i thought make a thread for both Let's split them, make this the the 3583 one and the other 3582. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar_Marcel Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 AR 3583 is considered a Beta-Gamma right now! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 And growing like a politicians ego. Activity up too, noted on solar soft. Needs to develop a bit more…. Its buddy needs to get’er in gear though… 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parabolic Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 (edited) Edit: Nvm I got things flip flopped somehow 😅 Would this region now qualify as having reversed polarity. Edited February 12 by Parabolic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian Kobyłecki Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Parabolic said: Edit: Nvm I got things flip flopped somehow 😅 Would this region now qualify as having reversed polarity. From what I know, in the northern hemisphere it should be negative on the left and positive on the right, so everything is fine. A region of reverse polarity would rather appear at high latitude Edited February 13 by Adrian Kobyłecki 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parabolic Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 28 minutes ago, Adrian Kobyłecki said: From what I know, in the northern hemisphere it should be negative on the left and positive on the right, so everything is fine. A region of reverse polarity would rather appear at high latitude Thank you. Moments after posting that I realized I got mixed up haha. I appreciate the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 This spot has a reversed polarity magnetic field now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 5 minutes ago, SpaceWeather5464 said: This spot has a reversed polarity magnetic field now. I don't see it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Just now, mozy said: I don't see it. The negatives are on the right while the positives are on the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 (edited) 11 minutes ago, SpaceWeather5464 said: The negatives are on the right while the positives are on the left. Are you talking about these ones, If so It's just the typical issue when regions move further away from our vantage point it gets harder to identify the polarities when they get closer to the limb. I don't see any reversed polarities with this one. Edited February 17 by mozy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 8 minutes ago, mozy said: Are you talking about these ones, If so It's just the typical issue when regions move further away from our vantage point it gets harder to identify the polarities when they get closer to the limb. I don't see any reversed polarities with this one. Yes this region. But isn’t SDO’s Magnetogram accurate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 1 minute ago, SpaceWeather5464 said: Yes this region. But isn’t SDO’s Magnetogram accurate? It is until they reach closer to the limb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceWeather5464 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Just now, mozy said: It is until they reach closer to the limb. The spot had this setup two days ago when it was closer to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Not seeing any clear negative polarity spots on the far western side over the past 2 days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Majors Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 It might produce m class if it gets stronger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now