Isatsuki San Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 It is seen that the density in DSCOVR had a rise from 98.5 and then went down, but may I ask why that happens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZPL Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Actually it seems like it was a bug in ACE: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/real-time-solar-wind It's currently an active spacecraft, so its data are displayed on SWL instead of DSCOVR's. I don't know why this happened though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 (edited) Several hits have been recorded against the DSCOVR : https://iswa.gsfc.nasa.gov/IswaSystemWebApp/ UTC , 2023 -05-03 11 : 51 Velocity = 489 Km/s Bz = 1 nT UTC 2023 -05-03 12:51 Velocity = 498 Km/s Bz = =0 nT UTC , 2023-05-03 14 :24 Velocity = 509 Km/s Bz = -1 nT maybe coronal Affectation is perceived on the internet Edited May 3 by Jhon Henry Osorio Orozco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 8 minutes ago, Jhon Henry Osorio Orozco said: Several hits have been recorded against the DSCOVR : So you know they aren't CME arrivals. DSCOVR has issues, but the magnetometer is good. ACE is old and has its own set of issues. You just need to keep watching to learn them. I believe we are in a weak CIR, currently ahead of a weak CH HSS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher S. Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 There's really no mystery to solve here: Yes, there are frequent bugs with both ACE and DSCOVR. For one thing, they're out in the vacuum of space. For another thing, they are old machines. Monitors switch between these two if there are issues, and outages have occurred frequently over the lifespan of the crafts. In most instances, the crafts shut themselves down to protect sensitive equipment if the environment is too challenging. Data sometimes gets messed up as well. These things are to be expected. 1 hour ago, Jhon Henry Osorio Orozco said: Affectation is perceived on the internet I believe you are enthusiastic about all of this, but the auto-translate is struggling to provide coherent sentences. There does not appear to be anything noteworthy on its way, based on SOHO/LASCO imagery, WSA-Enlil, and EPAM. You must review all relevant products to make a semi-accurate forecast. You also cannot forecast the N/S component of the IMF, which is a major factor of the impacts felt by Earth. Lastly, SWPC posts watches, warnings, etc. here: https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/reports/noaa-swpc-alerts-watches-and-warnings.html In short: We have a page, and a whole branch of NOAA dedicated to accomplishing the task you're here doing for us. It's appreciated but unnecessary. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/aurora-30-minute-forecast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Both the ACE and the are good (DSCOVR) https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/real-time-solar-wind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now