Jump to content

Past sunspots discussion: Region 12673 | August 30, 2017 - September 10, 2017


IlikeAuroras

Recommended Posts

I would like to talk about interesting sunspots of the past. We can start off with region 12673 since it formed and grew rapidly, possibly during a solar minimum. More than half of the top 50 solar flares in 2017 occurred in region 12673, and is the reason for the strongest geomagnetic storm of SC24 [KP8]. For me, this is quite an unusual sunspot, because of its occurrence in late 2017, which might be a year in solar minimum.
This sunspot could be comparable to region 10930 in December 2006, but that could be in an another topic of its own.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was prompted by a recent discovery of P Bythos to investigate just such an occurrence ( recurrence) of the AR during the declining phase of SC 20 which produced a staggering series of flares and some of the most spectacular prominences ever photographed. In addition it was responsible for triggering magnetic mines during the Vietnam war! It was thought to have made five full passes by our side before expiring.  I saw one of displays first hand Aug 4 1972   yeah baby!! 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/18/2023 at 12:51 AM, IlikeAuroras said:

I would like to talk about interesting sunspots of the past. We can start off with region 12673 since it formed and grew rapidly, possibly during a solar minimum. More than half of the top 50 solar flares in 2017 occurred in region 12673, and is the reason for the strongest geomagnetic storm of SC24 [KP8]. For me, this is quite an unusual sunspot, because of its occurrence in late 2017, which might be a year in solar minimum.
This sunspot could be comparable to region 10930 in December 2006, but that could be in an another topic of its own.

If you check back through the archive you will find that there was an active region in this position for five rotations 

AR2665 grew to BGD and produced a couple of M flares in July

AR2670 was only Alpha in August

AR2682 produced a few B flares in October

AR2685 was last appearance in November

It might be informative to check complexities / size of each of these regions, and 10.7cm flux as well, to see why it behaved so differently on each appearance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hamateur 1953 said:

I was prompted by a recent discovery of P Bythos to investigate just such an occurrence ( recurrence) of the AR during the declining phase of SC 20 which produced a staggering series of flares and some of the most spectacular prominences ever photographed. In addition it was responsible for triggering magnetic mines during the Vietnam war! It was thought to have made five full passes by our side before expiring.  I saw one of displays first hand Aug 4 1972   yeah baby!! 

 

Can you link to any pictures of said prominences? I’m curious to see them, if they were so magnificent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/August_1972_solar_stormI ran across only one that id seen before and suck bigtime at linking anything having sent… exactly the WRONG THING to a certain fm. But will try cuz well gotta learn something useful here anyway iphony or not!! backinabit hopefully    Well heck, I was pretty sure id have difficulty finding that single pix, at the time I was merely trying to verify a memory as true that it did enter the gamma region. and it did indeed. Likely not the specific flare that really raised hell with stuff here, but impressive in its duration.  I was following link after link sri sam. maybe I will order a new brain from amazon soon🤣🤣 You will know if you find the monster cuz it wraps around the backside before it splits. Awesomeness   look at the top I inserted it incorrectly.  but a brief synopsis of the storm. 

Edited by hamateur 1953
failed to find flareporn
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Sam!   Btw the august 4 1972 still surprises me in yet another quite unexpected way!   It ranked only 13th on the running “ scoreboard “ of potsdam A indices!! gee. wondering just why that might be. Anyone?? 2003 storms really ranked up there at #6 and #16!  perhaps it is tougher to measure buffeting and the like, just a wild guess here!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, hamateur 1953 said:

Thanks Sam!   Btw the august 4 1972 still surprises me in yet another quite unexpected way!   It ranked only 13th on the running “ scoreboard “ of potsdam A indices!! gee. wondering just why that might be. Anyone?? 2003 storms really ranked up there at #6 and #16!  perhaps it is tougher to measure buffeting and the like, just a wild guess here!! 

The article said that the main CME was largely northward Bz, I would think that might by why the geomagnetic activity is a little lower, as compared to other great storms?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you also agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.