Jump to content

possible CME arrival


MinYoongi

Recommended Posts

So, according to this Tweet and Nasa's Enlil Forecast, yesterday's filament eruption should / could arrive sunday.

Ive seen the model run and it looks okay, the tweet said KP5 cant be ruled out but no greater storming should happen. (Sorry aurora watchers from middle latitudes :( ) 

But the Nasa Enlil Model suggests Kp8 ? Can someone tell me more about that? Is that Model sensitive to some parameters or faulty? or because of the Clock Angle? (can someone explain this too?)

also i will link the Enlil run here

20220610_040900_2.0_anim.tim-den.gif

a03f3dc624d4c7a93f604f5459603cd7.png

 

Have fun to all high latitude aurora watchers :) 

  • Like 2
  • Cool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MinYoongi said:

So, according to this Tweet and Nasa's Enlil Forecast, yesterday's filament eruption should / could arrive sunday.

Ive seen the model run and it looks okay, the tweet said KP5 cant be ruled out but no greater storming should happen. (Sorry aurora watchers from middle latitudes :( ) 

But the Nasa Enlil Model suggests Kp8 ? Can someone tell me more about that? Is that Model sensitive to some parameters or faulty? or because of the Clock Angle? (can someone explain this too?)

also i will link the Enlil run here

20220610_040900_2.0_anim.tim-den.gif

a03f3dc624d4c7a93f604f5459603cd7.png

 

Have fun to all high latitude aurora watchers :) 

Where did the filament eruption come from? I didn’t see anything 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Newbie said:

According to SolarSoft all flares came from 89ºE limb locations and were not attributed to FE's.

It would be so unlikely to get Kp 8 from a FE.

N.

yup would take that with a grain of salt too. but we still maybe have a lil something arrive! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MinYoongi said:

yup would take that with a grain of salt too. but we still maybe have a lil something arrive! 

I'm not saying there won't be a 'Little something'. How about posting a pic of your FE?

The link above provides a location and not much else, no mention of a FE (have I missed something?)

Edited by Newbie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Newbie said:

I'm not saying there won't be a 'Little something'. How about posting a pic of your FE?

The link above provides a location and not much else, no mention of a FE (have I missed something?)

Check the comments of the tweet.. :) 

Im on Mobile, cant provide imagery now. Will do once im awake again. (its 4 am and im sleepy 😛 )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Orneno said:

Hey I’ll take anything at this point, after the Grand Solar Minimum of 2022

😂

Hah! That's what it felt like. Radio this week has been challenging and less fun than usual. As you've probably surmised from my various comments, shortwave radio aficionados prefer a high level of ionization of the F-Layer of the ionosphere along with the lowest possible Kp index. That's ideal.

When the UV and X radiation dropped a few days ago it brought magnetic field stability and low Kp indices. Great. But then the ionization of the F Layer, which had become quite high due to the sustained SFI of 160, faded down and down to where propagation was very poor.  In some cases certain forms of propagation that are normally reliable, even at solar minimum, became poor and started exhibiting odd behaviors like "one way skip". Normally, when you have a propagation path between two points on Earth, the propagation is roughly the same in both directions. If I hear you loudly, it's almost certain you'll also hear me. One-way-skip is a poorly understood phenomenon where signals are much stronger in one direction than the opposite direction. This makes operating challenging and frustrating. Not fun. It's all part of the game though and one-way-skip is fortunately fairly rare, but it happened pronouncedly this week as the ionization levels faded.

I suspect that this is a clue to understanding what causes one way skip, but I'm not an ionosphere physicist.  I dunno.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Orneno said:

Hey I’ll take anything at this point, after the Grand Solar Minimum of 2022

😂

Grand solar minimum of 2022? Our very first day with a spotless face on the sun does not quite make for a “grand solar minimum” IMNSHO…

A watched pot never boils!

The NE limb is showing something bright right around the limb! 
 

maybe a super spotted Sunday! And we have a Saharan dust cloud moving in which will reduce viewing conditions…

Alex & O’Riley 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, WildWill said:

Grand solar minimum of 2022? Our very first day with a spotless face on the sun does not quite make for a “grand solar minimum” IMNSHO

Maybe not, but the sun’s been really boring for several months now 😆

 

38 minutes ago, WildWill said:

And we have a Saharan dust cloud moving in which will reduce viewing conditions…

Sounds like a European problem 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Orneno said:

Maybe not, but the sun’s been really boring for several months now 😆

 

Sounds like a European problem 

It has kinda seemed to me that it has gone in fits and spurts… one day chicken, feathers the next… it like it has been all spotted up and then they all depart and nothing comes around the limb for a while… I’m new at sun worshiping, but it’s been interesting the last couple of months…

 

Actually, I’m in S Texas, you can see the dust cloud stretching across the Atlantic and Caribbean and into the Gulf of Mexico right up to the Texas Coast… gonna get worse all week according to the forecast. It will also continue to put a damper on any tropical development in the inter-tropical convergence zone…

It was pretty bad a couple of years ago. Doesn’t come up this far every year…

Interestingly enough, (little tidbit for ya) The Amazon basin has been built up by dust delivered from the Saharan Desert for millions of years, fertilizing it and replacing sediments washed down stream.

I went to the Canary Islands a couple of times, on Gran Canaria, there is a beach with sand dunes hundreds of feet high stretching inland a couple of miles from the water… It can be a long, difficult walk,particularly when you are carrying a cooler, umbrella, beach chairs, towels and my ex’s beach bags…  lol.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2022 at 2:03 AM, KW2P said:

In some cases certain forms of propagation that are normally reliable, even at solar minimum, became poor and started exhibiting odd behaviors like "one way skip". Normally, when you have a propagation path between two points on Earth, the propagation is roughly the same in both directions. If I hear you loudly, it's almost certain you'll also hear me. One-way-skip is a poorly understood phenomenon where signals are much stronger in one direction than the opposite direction. This makes operating challenging and frustrating. Not fun. It's all part of the game though and one-way-skip is fortunately fairly rare, but it happened pronouncedly this week as the ionization levels faded.

I suspect that this is a clue to understanding what causes one way skip, but I'm not an ionosphere physicist.  I dunno.

My marginally educated guess is that a highly dynamic ionosphere could create complex, assymetric refractive interfaces from numerous scintillation regions that split the transmitted radio wave into multiple paths that are either divergent or convergent or become phase shifted and combine constructively into strong signals or destructively into weaker signals.  One propagation direction may be constructive; the opposite direction may be destructive.  A change in the polarization of the radio wave  (elliptical, horizontal, vertical) might also occur across a complex ionospheric interface and produce a polarization at the receive antenna it is not optimally designed for.  Or, it could be sand.

Edited by Drax Spacex
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Drax Spacex said:

My marginally educated guess is that a highly dynamic ionosphere could create complex, assymetric refractive interfaces from numerous scintillation regions that split the transmitted radio wave into multiple paths that become phase shifted which can converge constructively into strong signals or converge destructively into weaker signals.  One propagation direction may be constructive; the other direction may be destructive.  A change in the polarization of the radio wave  (elliptical, horizontal, vertical) might also occur across a complex ionospheric interface and yield a radio wave polarization the receiving antenna may not be optimally designed for.

Yeah, my uneducated guess is along similar lines: the de-ionizaton is uneven, perhaps small layers form, creating some kind of birefringence effect(s) which sounds much like what you're proposing. Polarization does get rotated by the ionosphere. The ionosphere has been observed to frequently "prefer" horizontal polarization. If you transmit a vertically polarized signal, it arrives horizontally polarized. Weird.

This one-way-skip phenomenon is not subtle when it happens. The difference in signal strength between the forward and reverse paths can be on the order of 30 and 40 dB, so 10,000 to 1.  This is huge and much larger than polarization alone can explain. However, destructive interference as you suggest could create such a large difference.

We've long known that the F-layer splits into two layers during the daytime, reverting to a single layer at night, so I wonder if it's possible there are more layers under the right conditions.  But I'm just hypothesizing.

Now June 12 0740z. I guess we're waiting to get whacked by this CME😆

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you also agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.