Jump to content

New Study


Tormentius

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, Tormentius said:

I find it more than a little surprising that the scientists involved believe they can predict the occurrence of that event to an accuracy better than 0.01%. There is insufficient data in the linked article to understand how they might justify that claim. Elsewhere I found a suggestion that 9200 years would represent an ice-core depth of 128.8m. On that basis 1 year would be represented by 0.014m, or half an inch ! In any case we know that the cycle is not exactly 11 years, so I would take a lot of convincing that the report is accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tormentius said:

I was very skeptical of this study as well but I’ve seen very few experts comment on it so I wanted to hear some thoughts 

Heres a link to the study itself for whoever is interested 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27891-4#MOESM1

That link is much more informative about the methods used. There still seem to be some fairly large uncertainties, and effects that are not fully understood. I will probably need to read it a few more times to understand the full significance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you also agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.