Patrick P.A. Geryl Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Every relevant sunspot can be calculated beforehand. 1. The main objective from this project is to calculate large X flares and superflares. 2. Several correct predictions made on this site are included. 3. Enclosed the link how our sunspot theory works and 5 examples published on this site: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355037930_Electromagnetic_Waves_and_Solar_Killshots 4. We publish our sunspot predictions further on this site. The last ones can be found here; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archmonoth Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 6 hours ago, Patrick Geryl said: 4. We publish our sunspot predictions further on this site. Who is "we"? The link says it is just you, and still in pre-print, and not peer reviewed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quilloz Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 Patrick, I'm sorry to say this, but you're coming off like Ben Davidson by boasting about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher S. Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 Guys, there's gonna be a sunspot next week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick P.A. Geryl Posted October 6, 2021 Author Share Posted October 6, 2021 Op 4/10/2021 om 00:08, Archmonoth zei: Who is "we"? The link says it is just you, and still in pre-print, and not peer reviewed. Who do you think makes the remarks on the sunspots? I don't... And there is also somebody else helping... But... There is so much to research, it is really overwhelming... Op 5/10/2021 om 09:16, Christopher S. zei: Guys, there's gonna be a sunspot next week Christopher... If you know some smart guys who can help... Op 4/10/2021 om 16:34, Quilloz zei: Patrick, I'm sorry to say this, but you're coming off like Ben Davidson by boasting about this. Nobody is interested in sunspots that do nothing... And sunspots can be violent and dangerous... That's modern life (the Romans hadn't to worry about this) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quilloz Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 7 hours ago, Patrick Geryl said: Nobody is interested in sunspots that do nothing... And sunspots can be violent and dangerous... That's modern life (the Romans hadn't to worry about this) It doesn't negate my point that you're acting like Davidson in how your answer is the only right one that there is. Though linking to one of his videos in another thread didn't really help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted October 7, 2021 Share Posted October 7, 2021 Why include the NASA article rather than its research document? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick P.A. Geryl Posted October 7, 2021 Author Share Posted October 7, 2021 4 uren geleden, Jesterface23 zei: Why include the NASA article rather than its research document? We give you or anyone else the opportunity to rewrite the article as co-author. It is rather long, so a part that you think that can be used for publication is also ok. Mind: our published Springer article costed around 11 rewrites because we didn’t know how to do it. who takes the challenge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted October 7, 2021 Share Posted October 7, 2021 If you know the research document isn't as complete as it could be, why rush to publish it? Looking for co-authors isn't within the document and you already post info here on this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick P.A. Geryl Posted October 7, 2021 Author Share Posted October 7, 2021 9 minuten geleden, Jesterface23 zei: If you know the research document isn't as complete as it could be, why rush to publish it? Looking for co-authors isn't within the document and you already post info here on this site. We did the same with our published Springer article. Afterwards it was rewritten extensively. It is a matter of copyright: who finds first the sunspot theory? Since it is the longest searched for theory… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archmonoth Posted October 7, 2021 Share Posted October 7, 2021 (edited) On 10/6/2021 at 1:05 AM, Patrick Geryl said: Who do you think makes the remarks on the sunspots? I don't... And there is also somebody else helping... But... There is so much to research, it is really overwhelming... I learned you also thought the world was going to end in 2012, and wrote books on this subject? Your motives are highly suspect Patrick. Rather than science or refined truth, you seem interested in "Kill-shots" and "Dangerous and Violent predictions." Science and Astronomy cares about non-dangerous Sunspots, lumpy asteroids, and trivial planets. Knowledge is not in the glamour and the awestruck terror of the universe, but in the mundane details. Your predictions are VAGUE, which means they offer no details which result in a more refined understanding. Your rhetoric seems determined on avoiding any specifics, since you are convinced you are correct. Anyone claiming to "check-mate" astronomers is clearly not interested in expanding knowledge, but in being an adversary to knowledge. Planet alignments, and their magnetic fields offer nothing new. Sunspot models have been complete for years without including them. Your ideas are unfalsifiable, which is a sign of pseudo-science, and it seems there is no evidence you will accept to change your mind. Please get your ideas peer reviewed, avoid sensationalism, and be humble to knowledge. This is meant as constructive criticism. Edited October 7, 2021 by Archmonoth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted October 8, 2021 Share Posted October 8, 2021 What are the odds of more than one person coming to the same result at the same time on a fairly specific topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quilloz Posted October 8, 2021 Share Posted October 8, 2021 13 hours ago, Jesterface23 said: What are the odds of more than one person coming to the same result at the same time on a fairly specific topic? Quite low once you actually do a google search. You can see his books, SpaceWeatherLive account and his ResearchGate account all in the same page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now