New physics principle that defies all logic

[Patrick P.A. Geryl]

REMARK: EVERYBODY CAN UNDERSTAND IT!

I found a new mathematical-physics principle that is easy to understand. It defies all logic. I submitted it to mathematical-physics journals, but they couldn't find a fault! Is there a mathematician who can help getting it published?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349806182_A_New_Mathematical-Physics_Principle_for_Differential_Rotating_Bodies

Dear Mr. Geryl,

 Submitted to Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.

 Informal consultations with possible reviewers have persuaded me that your article is too specialized for our journal, and we therefore cannot accept it for publication.  We advise you to submit it to a journal more narrowly focused on the field of your article.

Thank you for considering Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.

 Sincerely,

 H. M.

Editor of Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

 

Dear Mr. Geryl,

 Thank you for submitting your manuscript to "Journal of Geometry and Physics". After studying the paper and keeping in mind the large number of excellent submissions the Journal gets each year, the editors regret they cannot consider your manuscript for publication in Journal of Geometry and Physics. Therefore, we are returning it to you.

 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

 Yours sincerely,

L. J.

Editor

Journal of Geometry and Physics

[Archmonoth]

I glanced at your link. How does rotational differences between the equator and poles of the Sun defy logic? 

 

 

Edited March 5, 2021 by Archmonoth

[Christopher S.]

Wouldn't "defies all logic" be an inherent contradiction to putting out a research paper that is designed to illustrate the logic of a new principle? Geryl, you gotta drop the sensationalized language from your work if you want it to be taken seriously. You shouldn't need some random GED-recipient on the internet to tell you that.

[3gMike]

Patrick,

In your linked article you state:

BUT NOW COMES THE CATCH: You cannot divide DAYS by DAYS in physics. It gives a number… That’s it… So, the calculation is right… But the physics doesn’t add up…

Here is the fault:  83.77899 days/25.75 days = 3.253553 (number!) 83.77899 days/37.1764 days = 2.253553 (number!)

Herein lies a misunderstanding. You are not dividing days by days, since the figures of 25.75 (equator) or 37.1764 (polar) are actually days / rotation. So the result is number of rotations.