Popular Post hamateur 1953 Posted Tuesday at 08:50 AM Popular Post Share Posted Tuesday at 08:50 AM (edited) Well, someone had to start it.  Both @MinYoongi and me were afraid of busting the servers.🤣🤣 But it doesn’t look very impressive presently.  Hopefully there are more to come soon. Edited Tuesday at 08:59 AM by hamateur 1953 Title change 2 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted Tuesday at 01:09 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:09 PM Welp, today isn't looking any better. Maybe old region 3664/3697 is coming around to say goodbye. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Justanerd Posted Tuesday at 01:14 PM Solution Share Posted Tuesday at 01:14 PM (edited) 5 minutes ago, Jesterface23 said: Welp, today isn't looking any better. Maybe old region 3664/3697 is coming around to say goodbye. Ok… more confusion!! Spaceweather.com is once again saying that ar 3723 is the old 3664/3697 www.spaceweather.com Edited Tuesday at 01:16 PM by Justanerd Add screenshot 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesterface23 Posted Tuesday at 01:22 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:22 PM 6 minutes ago, Justanerd said: Ok… more confusion!! Spaceweather.com is once again saying that ar 3723 is the old 3664/3697 www.spaceweather.com Someone tell them to double check the coordinates lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted Tuesday at 03:47 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 03:47 PM 2 hours ago, Jesterface23 said: Someone tell them to double check the coordinates lol At least they’re in the same hemisphere and approximately same latitude.  I doubt it will get corrected especially if 3723 pops out an X class or two. 🤣 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justanerd Posted Tuesday at 04:47 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:47 PM 58 minutes ago, hamateur 1953 said: At least they’re in the same hemisphere and approximately same latitude.  I doubt it will get corrected especially if 3723 pops out an X class or two. 🤣 And 3727 isn’t likely to do that - especially in its current configuration 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamateur 1953 Posted Tuesday at 08:11 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 08:11 PM (edited) Just had a look at Jan Alvestad’s site STAR.  No 3227. However it is essentially S9827 apparently. Should anyone else here be curious. Sometimes there are different opinions worldwide. Nothing new there😇 While there I couldn’t help but notice that Patrick seems to practically quote verbatim Jans written assessments.  Except I’m pretty sure Jan relies on historical behaviors of typical active regions. Just my opinion here.  Mike  ( Hagrid is sleeping) My reason for noting the similarities has to do with Patricks assertion in another thread that 3723 was capable of producing a major flare.  I had read a discussion in unproven theories recently with others giving dates when he expected these to occur. Pretty bold.  Haha.  Was concerned that here we go again! Edited Tuesday at 08:29 PM by hamateur 1953 Reasoning 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunlive123 Posted Thursday at 03:39 PM Share Posted Thursday at 03:39 PM New one. https://sdowww.lmsal.com/sdomedia/ssw/media/ssw/ssw_client/data/ssw_service_240627_030659_24896/www/SSW_cutout_20240627T0942-20240627T1028_AIA_131-193-171_S16E45_ssw_cutout_20240627_094206_aia_304_S16E45_20240627_094205_m.mp4 Â Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now